Appealing Film Ratings from the MPAA in 2012

In today’s economy the entertainment industry is undergoing a lot of changes and film makers have become much more heavily invested in less restrictive film ratings. Obviously, this has become a big deal to the film makers because of the audience sizes for PG-13 and PG films being much more attractive in size and revenue over ones that are rated R or NC-17. Usually a G rated film is usually only for family films now a days, which would make this non applicable in this post. G rated films make serious money and are generally most profitable in a whole though.

Recently there has been some upheaval about films that received unfavorable ratings, such as the upcoming film “Bully”, where film director Harvey Weinstein’s (The Artist won the 2011 Oscar for Best Picture), latest flick received an R rating over a couple of f-bombs. In agreement to Weinstein, who’s appeal for the film was rejected (Bully remains an R-rated film.), I think that with the changes of time that the MPAA needs to change their standards on how films/entertainment is rated. While everyone is pushing towards “wholesome family friendly entertainment,” I really think people need to be better educated on the content which isn’t deemed “wholesome and family friendly” and be able to have a better mind for their own when they see a drop of blood or after hearing some choice four letter words. I remember watching Casino Royale back in 2007 thinking this was the most violent and adult PG-13 movie I had seen in years, there is gratuitous levels of violence, suggestive sexuality themes, gambling, and a torture scene. These are things we have become accustomed to in American culture, and yes, people know these sorts of things are not desirable in today’s society, if we become better educated on them, and the potential detrimental effect they can place upon society, then I don’t think this will be as much of a problem. I recently learned about the “Cultivation Theory” where media effects scholar George Gerbner talks about how “people who watch a little too much TV, start to think the world is a more dangerous place than it really is.” End rant.

Lower ratings are now desirable in films because of how sensitive parents have gotten over media effects, and from the cathartic effects movies have had on youth now a days. Youth are constantly being targeted since; they have the ability to nag their parents about going to see a movie on a Friday night with their friends. College students are adults who are able to make their own decisions and thus have begun seeking other entertainment alternatives since going to see movies in an actual big screen theater has become much too costly for most adults to consider seeing a movie now a days. I mentioned earlier how “G” rated movies make the most money in the box office. To articulate this, look at large families with small children. Children are VULNERABLE targets in advertising and can easily command their parents to take them to see the latest Ice Age film on opening weekend. People go to see kid’s films in large amounts, Mom, Dad, little brother, little sister, etc. There is also a good chance this could become a large group outing with multiple families involved, when tickets are about $10 for admission this obviously shows why ”family” films have become very desirable and highly profitable in today’s economy. Think about that.

Some other failed film appeals so far have been “Sea Level” which is an action adventure film that unsuccessfully tried to score a “G” rating, and “Killer Joe” which also failed in its attempt to be rated lower than NC-17. One film “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” however did manage to get their film lowered to a PG-13 from an R rating. There is also mention in a LA Times article I read about how independent film makers feel they have are being biased against by the MPAA, thus a majority of independent films get an R rating, although when I watch them, I rarely see any questionable content, just groups of adults talking about complex and existential subject matter. 12 films have been appealed for their ratings in 2012 which is a high number for the MPAA, and most of 700 films the MPAA rates per year rarely get appealed. It’s rare that the MPAA appeals to into the double digits, according to LA Times. I however think that this number will increase as film makers become more and more rating conscious.

About butteryobread

BUTTER YO BREAD! A PLACE TO GET YOUR BREAD BUTTERED! BRING THE LOTION! Writing about music, art, and anything else which makes you wanna butter some bread!
This entry was posted in Entertainment and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Appealing Film Ratings from the MPAA in 2012

  1. Actually, the more profitable films in the last decade or so tend to be PG 13. I guess it’s seen as somewhat of a compromise. Where kids can see it and adults without kids can sit through them. You did bring up some good points, smaller films (and horror films too) tend to get smacked around more by the MPAA.To me the big problem isn’t the ratings but the baggage attached to certain ratings. Like the fact that an NC-17 movies does not stand a chance in hell of getting shown outside of art theaters or the fact that you can cram as much violence as possible in a pg 13 film as long as you don’t have any heavy gore and go easy on showing blood. Now, if you show a little bit of nudity/sexuality and say the word FUCK more than three times then you are FUCKED.

    • I can agree to that. Avatar and Titanic are exceptional films. I am discussing films in general. It is kinda skewed about what is shown in movies and what the exact guidelines are. It is a shame some movies even get an NC-17 rating, but you can see them in movie theatres. I remember seeing Hostel 2 with there being a full on BDSM scene in one of the hostels where someone is killed. I guess a good way to look at the article is to imagine yourself as a film maker on the verge of releasing a film. I’m sure you already know that one though. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s